Miscellaneous

Amuk in AfPak

So apparently there was an entirely inconsequential election in Afghanistan yesterday. Helena Cobban’s got a roundup of the story, and Registan has been great all week.

My only contribution to the coverage is a plea for abbreviational evenhandedness. As long as people are too lazy to say or write “Afghanistan and Pakistan,” lumping them together under the vaguely intergalactic-sounding acronym “Afpak”,  I propose that we do the same to refer to the two principal nations behind the war effort.

“Amuk” has a nice ring to it, wouldn’t you say?

wordpress stats

Discussion

7 thoughts on “Amuk in AfPak

  1. Well said. Enough of this Orwellian nonsense. Down with NewSpeak.

    Posted by Sasa | August 21, 2009, 7:48 pm
  2. So you do not think that we should use BRIC , OECD, G8 …:-)

    Sasa,
    I am not certain that such usages as AfPak or BRIC qualify as Orwellian Newspeak.

    Posted by Ghassan Karam | August 22, 2009, 7:36 am
  3. No, acronyms (collections of initials) like the OECD, EU, even US are not NewSpeak. Newspeak is the contraction of words to create a new shorter word devoid of meaning. Like AfPak. Although it should be written Afpak to be truly Newspeak. Have a look at this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Newspeak_words

    Ah, now I want to read Nineteen Eighty Four all over again!

    Posted by Sasa | August 22, 2009, 7:41 am
  4. Nicely said E 🙂

    Posted by Sprinx | August 23, 2009, 5:45 pm
  5. Sasa,
    I believe that I have read almost everything that has ever been published by Orwell. I even share the ideas expressed by Christopher Hitchens in his “Why Orwell Matters”. Yrt I do not believe that AfPak can be considered newspeak. Yes it is a contraction but so is coop among many other contractions. Please don’t tell me that infotainment is newspeak 🙂

    Posted by ghassan karam | August 23, 2009, 6:41 pm
  6. Define Newspeak.

    Posted by Sasa | August 23, 2009, 6:44 pm
  7. Sasa,
    It was not my intenyion to get into a lengthy discourse about Newspeak but merely to object to at best a “loose” descrition of it. Anyway Newspeak is in essence the conscious effort to limit and/or change the meaning of a word. Usually the new term is designed to further the intersts of the party. The best example that comes to mind is the word free: It can be used as such: the road is free of potholes but one cannot speak of political and intellectual freedoms. A contraction that is used in an effort to save time ; BRIC or AfPak ; does not have an overriding purpose to promote the party and so it does not qualify as newspeak, in my opinion. You can have the last word on this , if you wish.

    Posted by Ghassan Karam | August 23, 2009, 8:15 pm

Are you just gonna stand there and not respond?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Browse archives

And the people say…

netsp on On Reza Aslan’s “B…
db on Maronites, Arabs, Phoenicians,…
Akbar Palace on Assad and ISIS
Vulcan on Assad and ISIS
Steve Keville (a.k.a… on Bistraynti `Alaykun

wordpress stats plugin
%d bloggers like this: