So apparently there was an entirely inconsequential election in Afghanistan yesterday. Helena Cobban’s got a roundup of the story, and Registan has been great all week.
My only contribution to the coverage is a plea for abbreviational evenhandedness. As long as people are too lazy to say or write “Afghanistan and Pakistan,” lumping them together under the vaguely intergalactic-sounding acronym “Afpak”, I propose that we do the same to refer to the two principal nations behind the war effort.
“Amuk” has a nice ring to it, wouldn’t you say?
Qifa Nabki 
Well said. Enough of this Orwellian nonsense. Down with NewSpeak.
Posted by Sasa | August 21, 2009, 7:48 pmSo you do not think that we should use BRIC , OECD, G8 …:-)
Sasa,
I am not certain that such usages as AfPak or BRIC qualify as Orwellian Newspeak.
Posted by Ghassan Karam | August 22, 2009, 7:36 amNo, acronyms (collections of initials) like the OECD, EU, even US are not NewSpeak. Newspeak is the contraction of words to create a new shorter word devoid of meaning. Like AfPak. Although it should be written Afpak to be truly Newspeak. Have a look at this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Newspeak_words
Ah, now I want to read Nineteen Eighty Four all over again!
Posted by Sasa | August 22, 2009, 7:41 amNicely said E 🙂
Posted by Sprinx | August 23, 2009, 5:45 pmSasa,
I believe that I have read almost everything that has ever been published by Orwell. I even share the ideas expressed by Christopher Hitchens in his “Why Orwell Matters”. Yrt I do not believe that AfPak can be considered newspeak. Yes it is a contraction but so is coop among many other contractions. Please don’t tell me that infotainment is newspeak 🙂
Posted by ghassan karam | August 23, 2009, 6:41 pmDefine Newspeak.
Posted by Sasa | August 23, 2009, 6:44 pmSasa,
It was not my intenyion to get into a lengthy discourse about Newspeak but merely to object to at best a “loose” descrition of it. Anyway Newspeak is in essence the conscious effort to limit and/or change the meaning of a word. Usually the new term is designed to further the intersts of the party. The best example that comes to mind is the word free: It can be used as such: the road is free of potholes but one cannot speak of political and intellectual freedoms. A contraction that is used in an effort to save time ; BRIC or AfPak ; does not have an overriding purpose to promote the party and so it does not qualify as newspeak, in my opinion. You can have the last word on this , if you wish.
Posted by Ghassan Karam | August 23, 2009, 8:15 pm